Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | RSS | More
Kingwood Flooding Truth: Stop the Talking Points. Start the Facts.
If you live in Kingwood, here’s the uncomfortable truth: your house doesn’t care about campaign slogans. Water doesn’t care about Facebook “hot takes.” And flooding sure as hell doesn’t stop because someone repeats the same blame script loud enough.
My podcast is blunt for a reason. The misinformation about Kingwood flooding, SJRA, Lake Houston, and what actually protects this community is out of control.
And no—this isn’t abstract politics. It’s about whether Kingwood gets the money, coordination, and leadership needed to avoid being wrecked again.
Why This Matters: Kingwood Is One Flood Away
Kingwood is not “fine.” Kingwood is not “overreacting.” And Kingwood is not protected by vibes.
Kingwood is one major event away from:
- flooded homes,
- destroyed property values,
- residents displaced for months,
- businesses wiped out,
- and the kind of community trauma that people outside flood zones never understand.
So when candidates (and their supporters) toss around lazy one-liners like “SJRA did it” and call anyone who disagrees a liar—here’s what that is: political theater. And political theater doesn’t install flood gates.
The Actual Flood Timeline: What Happened (1994 → 2017 → 2019 → Imelda)
1994: Releases + “Handshake Agreement” Mentality
In October 1994, heavy rain forced officials to release water from Lake Conroe and it flooded parts of Kingwood. Rescues happened. It was ugly. Then a “post-mortem” mindset took over: don’t release like that again and we’ll be fine.
That’s not infrastructure. That’s hope. Hope is not a flood plan.
2017: Hurricane Harvey — The Event Everyone Remembers
In 2017, Hurricane Harvey hits. Water releases happened. Homes flooded. Boats launched. People stranded. Deaths. Evacuations. A disaster that scarred the area.
Harvey exposed a brutal reality:
- Lake Houston’s aging dam and gates can’t discharge fast enough
- coordination between Lake Conroe and Lake Houston matters
- and when it goes wrong, Kingwood pays the bill
2019: Elm Grove Flooding — A Different Story People Keep Lying About
Here’s where the “SJRA did everything” crowd loses the plot.
Elm Grove flooding (2019) wasn’t a Harvey rerun. It wasn’t just “the river.” It was tied to development and drainage: land cleared and elevated, runoff directed, and downstream neighborhoods taking the hit.
Beth describes:
- being on the Elm Grove HOA board,
- two rain events exposing the problem,
- water flowing into neighborhoods through a large drainage pipe,
- and Montgomery County officials refusing responsibility.
You can argue the politics. But pretending every flood has one single cause is ignorant or dishonest—pick one.
Imelda: “You Barely Recovered—Now Do It Again”
After residents rebuilt from earlier flooding, Tropical Storm Imelda hit and the damage expanded—hundreds more homes affected.
This is the part people who “debate” flooding from safe neighborhoods don’t get: these aren’t “weather events.” These are life events. They erase years of work in hours.
The Ugly Part: Development + Drainage + Enforcement Failures
According to the transcript, a core issue wasn’t just rainfall—it was how runoff was handled when land was developed and elevated.
This is the simplest way to explain what Beth is accusing:
- developers elevate land (so their lots are “safer”),
- runoff gets pushed into adjacent neighborhoods,
- and enforcement in the upstream jurisdiction is weak or nonexistent,
- meaning downstream residents become collateral damage.
If you represent a district touching these problems and you refuse to engage, you’re not “conservative.” You’re not “pro-family.” You’re useless.
Crenshaw vs. Toth: The Tale of Two Candidates
This transcript isn’t “neutral.” It’s an argument. And it’s built around one big comparison: who shows up and listens vs who repeats talking points and shuts people out.
What Beth Says Dan Crenshaw Did
Per the transcript, Beth credits Dan Crenshaw with:
- showing up to help residents (including muck-outs),
- supporting community recovery efforts through local networks,
- and pursuing/obtaining funding and support for mitigation-related projects (including dredging-related impacts and broader federal involvement).
The point isn’t that Crenshaw is perfect. The point is: he engaged with the problem.
What Beth Says Steve Toth Did (And Didn’t Do)
Beth describes reaching out to Steve Toth to discuss flooding—specifically the Elm Grove / North Park side issues that weren’t just “Harvey.”
The transcript claims:
- Toth refused meaningful engagement,
- dismissed or ignored residents’ distinctions,
- pushed a simplified blame narrative,
- and even banned critics from his page after they challenged claims.
Here’s the blunt reality: someone who won’t listen to constituents on life-and-property issues has no business asking for their vote.
Stop the SJRA-Only Script: It’s Not a Solution, It’s a Crutch
Beth’s argument is not “SJRA is irrelevant.” Her argument is: SJRA is not the only cause, and blaming SJRA for everything is a dodge.
Why does that matter?
Because if your fix is “fire a guy” and scream “SJRA” forever, you’re not doing mitigation—you’re doing branding.
Flood mitigation involves:
- discharge capacity,
- gate modernization,
- sediment management,
- watershed management,
- drainage coordination across jurisdictions,
- enforcement of development standards,
- and funding.
If a candidate can’t talk through that like an adult, they shouldn’t be anywhere near the levers of power.
Flood Warning Systems and the “Personal Responsibility” Line
One of the most abrasive parts of the transcript is Beth’s reaction to Toth’s “personal responsibility” framing in flood-death contexts.
Here’s the thing: personal responsibility matters—but it’s not a substitute for:
- warning infrastructure,
- accurate real-time gauges,
- coordinated evacuation routing,
- and public systems that prevent mass casualty scenarios.
Blaming victims as a political posture is not “tough love.” It’s lazy.
The Real Question Kingwood Voters Should Ask
Forget the memes. Forget the consultant talking points. Ask this:
“When I tell you my neighborhood flooded, do you listen—or do you lecture?”
Because water doesn’t care whether a candidate “won” a debate online. It cares whether:
- the gates get upgraded,
- the drainage gets enforced,
- the sediment gets managed,
- and the funding gets secured.
Beth’s conclusion is simple:
- Kingwood needs a representative who can actually deliver resources and coordination,
- not someone who turns everything into a one-note grievance campaign.
Bottom Line: This Is Not a Hobby for Kingwood
People outside flood zones treat flooding like content. People who’ve lived it treat flooding like survival.
If you’re in Kingwood, Humble, Atascocita, or nearby areas affected by these systems, this is not theoretical:
- Your home is your biggest asset.
- Your neighborhood stability matters.
- Your insurance and recovery timelines matter.
- Your life during a major event matters.
And if your elected representative can’t handle the complexity—Kingwood loses.
FAQ
Is Elm Grove flooding the same as Hurricane Harvey flooding in Kingwood?
No. According to the transcript, Elm Grove flooding involved a different chain of events tied to drainage/development issues rather than being simply a repeat of Harvey dynamics.
Why are Lake Houston gates important?
Lake Houston’s discharge capacity is a major factor in how quickly water can be released and managed during extreme events. Aging infrastructure can increase downstream flooding risk.
What does “SJRA” stand for and why is it controversial?
SJRA is the San Jacinto River Authority. It’s often discussed in relation to releases and water management, but the transcript argues that blaming SJRA alone ignores other major causes of flooding.
Why does the CD2 primary matter for Kingwood flooding?
The transcript argues that federal relationships and funding priorities can impact mitigation projects, and leadership style (listening vs. dismissing) affects whether local problems get addressed.
